Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,460 $
▲ 0.33%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,683 $
▼ -0.09%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999994 $
▲ 0.04%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
685.88 $
▲ 0.70%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
159.88 $
▼ -1.32%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.493354 $
▲ 0.00%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.146183 $
▼ -1.43%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
7.04 $
▼ -2.81%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.434643 $
▼ -3.28%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000023 $
▼ -1.02%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
32.31 $
▼ -3.41%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.114717 $
▲ 1.82%
Tỷ giá Bitcoin Cash BCH BCH
471.38 $
▼ -2.65%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
15.81 $
▼ -3.04%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between xWIN Finance (XWIN) and Knights of Cathena (CGO)

Differences between xWIN Finance (XWIN) and Knights of Cathena (CGO)

The table comparing the strength of xWIN Finance (XWIN) and Knights of Cathena (CGO), which helps you determine the potential value of xWIN Finance (XWIN) in the future based on the current value of Knights of Cathena (CGO) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

xWIN Finance xWIN Finance (XWIN)

Knights of Cathena Knights of Cathena (CGO)

Price 0.0344761370 USD 0.0001014696 USD
( = 0.00 xWIN Finance Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 61,483,844 100,722,581,141
(= 1,638.20 xWIN Finance Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 6913

N/A USD

Rank 5851

Volume 24h 309 USD 3,528 USD
Change 1h 2.95 % -0.73 %
Change 24h 0.73 % -6.23 %
Change 7d 13.40 % -16.36 %
Total trading pairs 20 More details 2 More details
Launched 07/2021 04/2024
Platform BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) MultiversX
Category Bnb Chain, Gaming, Elrond Ecosystem,
Chat room https://t.me/xwinfinance https://discord.knights-of-cathena.com/
Twitter https://twitter.com/xwinfinance https://twitter.com/twitter.knights-of-cathena.com
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare xWIN Finance (XWIN) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Knights of Cathena (CGO) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: