Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,109 $
▲ 0.35%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,742 $
▲ 0.23%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999939 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
600.76 $
▼ -0.03%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
167.24 $
▼ -0.04%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.540645 $
▲ 1.35%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.169633 $
▲ 3.86%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.39 $
▲ 0.60%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.460030 $
▲ 0.28%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
37.99 $
▲ 0.13%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 1.51%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.35 $
▲ 1.29%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.33 $
▼ -0.26%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113607 $
▼ -1.50%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Wrapped TAO (WTAO) and Army of Fortune Gem (AFG)

Differences between Wrapped TAO (WTAO) and Army of Fortune Gem (AFG)

The table comparing the strength of Wrapped TAO (WTAO) and Army of Fortune Gem (AFG), which helps you determine the potential value of Wrapped TAO (WTAO) in the future based on the current value of Army of Fortune Gem (AFG) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Wrapped TAO Wrapped TAO (WTAO)

Army of Fortune Gem Army of Fortune Gem (AFG)

Price 427.63 USD 0.0271890313 USD
( = 0.00 Wrapped TAO Price)
Supply 140,938 N/A
(= 0.00 Wrapped TAO Supply)
Total supply 21,000,000 1,000,000,000
(= 47.62 Wrapped TAO Total supply)
Marketcap 60,268,803 USD

Rank 597

N/A USD

Rank 4469

Volume 24h 660,368 USD 32,539 USD
Change 1h -0.25 % 0.11 %
Change 24h -2.06 % 8.22 %
Change 7d 11.57 % 82.53 %
Total trading pairs 22 More details 4 More details
Launched 02/2023 01/2024
Platform Ethereum Arbitrum
Category , Gaming, Governance, Metaverse, Dwf Labs Portfolio,
Chat room https://discord.gg/bittensor https://discord.com/invite/aofverse
Twitter https://twitter.com/bittensor_ https://twitter.com/AOFverse
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Wrapped TAO (WTAO) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Army of Fortune Gem (AFG) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: