Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
64,182 $
▼ -1.13%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,505 $
▼ -0.52%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999494 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
582.96 $
▼ -0.74%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
133.78 $
▼ -0.17%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999976 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.488351 $
▼ -0.34%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.123767 $
▼ -1.06%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
7.11 $
▼ -0.63%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.374540 $
▼ -3.04%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
27.30 $
▼ -1.57%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000018 $
▼ -1.23%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.118016 $
▲ 1.15%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
13.81 $
▼ -3.40%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
5.58 $
▼ -1.89%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Value Liquidity (VALUE) and Silva Token (SILVA)

Differences between Value Liquidity (VALUE) and Silva Token (SILVA)

The table comparing the strength of Value Liquidity (VALUE) and Silva Token (SILVA), which helps you determine the potential value of Value Liquidity (VALUE) in the future based on the current value of Silva Token (SILVA) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Value Liquidity Value Liquidity (VALUE)

Silva Token Silva Token (SILVA)

Price 0.0262994856 USD 0.0000000002 USD
( = 0.00 Value Liquidity Price)
Supply N/A 1,669,960,531,442,310
Total supply 6,626,401 2,000,000,000,000,000
(= 301,822,965.44 Value Liquidity Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 5936

251,052 USD

Rank 2096

Volume 24h 1,601 USD 18 USD
Change 1h -1.87 % 0.00 %
Change 24h 1.45 % -2.12 %
Change 7d 2.54 % -4.20 %
Total trading pairs 26 More details 5 More details
Launched 10/2020 11/2021
Platform Ethereum BNB Smart Chain (BEP20)
Category Defi, Yield Farming, Yield Aggregator, ,
Chat room https://t.me/ValueDeFi https://t.me/SilvaToken
Twitter https://twitter.com/value_defi https://twitter.com/ERANetworkGroup
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Value Liquidity (VALUE) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Silva Token (SILVA) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: