Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,264 $
▲ 1.08%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,749 $
▲ 0.60%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999886 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
602.25 $
▲ 0.35%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
168.45 $
▲ 0.39%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999984 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.541808 $
▲ 1.13%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.173961 $
▲ 6.20%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.38 $
▼ -0.23%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.462085 $
▲ 0.56%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.29 $
▲ 0.79%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 2.87%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.43 $
▲ 2.54%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.44 $
▲ 1.12%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113786 $
▼ -1.45%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Sentinel Protocol (UPP) and Safe (SAFE)

Differences between Sentinel Protocol (UPP) and Safe (SAFE)

The table comparing the strength of Sentinel Protocol (UPP) and Safe (SAFE), which helps you determine the potential value of Sentinel Protocol (UPP) in the future based on the current value of Safe (SAFE) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Sentinel Protocol Sentinel Protocol (UPP)

Safe Safe (SAFE)

Price 0.0836968625 USD 2.16 USD
( = 25.77 Sentinel Protocol Price)
Supply 497,834,800 N/A
(= 0.00 Sentinel Protocol Supply)
Total supply 500,000,000 29,600,000
(= 0.06 Sentinel Protocol Total supply)
Marketcap 41,667,211 USD

Rank 702

N/A USD

Rank 8724

Volume 24h 511,515 USD N/A USD
Change 1h 0.18 % 0.00 %
Change 24h 0.17 % 0.00 %
Change 7d -1.94 % -16.95 %
Total trading pairs 5 More details 28 More details
Launched 06/2018 05/2019
Platform Ethereum Safe blockchain
Category Ai Big Data, Dwf Labs Portfolio, Medium Of Exchange, Masternodes,
Chat room N/A https://t.me/safe_anwang
Twitter https://twitter.com/UPPSentinel https://twitter.com/safe_2018
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/Sentinel_Protocol https://reddit.com/r/SafeCoins

Compare Sentinel Protocol (UPP) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Safe (SAFE) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: