Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,947 $
▲ 0.05%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,909 $
▲ 5.33%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999521 $
▼ -0.05%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
612.23 $
▼ -1.05%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
175.55 $
▼ -2.03%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.528581 $
▼ -0.60%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.168455 $
▲ 1.50%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.48 $
▲ 3.18%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.483351 $
▼ -0.03%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
40.16 $
▼ -0.67%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000026 $
▼ -0.18%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.50 $
▼ -1.17%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.117888 $
▼ -2.98%
Tỷ giá Bitcoin Cash BCH BCH
507.21 $
▲ 0.69%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Sentinel Protocol (UPP) and Gamerse (LFG)

Differences between Sentinel Protocol (UPP) and Gamerse (LFG)

The table comparing the strength of Sentinel Protocol (UPP) and Gamerse (LFG), which helps you determine the potential value of Sentinel Protocol (UPP) in the future based on the current value of Gamerse (LFG) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Sentinel Protocol Sentinel Protocol (UPP)

Gamerse Gamerse (LFG)

Price 0.0854355326 USD 0.0002700451 USD
( = 0.00 Sentinel Protocol Price)
Supply 497,834,800 170,157,314
(= 0.34 Sentinel Protocol Supply)
Total supply 500,000,000 1,000,000,000
(= 2.00 Sentinel Protocol Total supply)
Marketcap 42,532,781 USD

Rank 685

45,950 USD

Rank 2417

Volume 24h 15,555,199 USD 337 USD
Change 1h 0.03 % -0.02 %
Change 24h 2.44 % -7.36 %
Change 7d 0.97 % 6.92 %
Total trading pairs 5 More details 57 More details
Launched 06/2018 07/2021
Platform Ethereum BNB Smart Chain (BEP20)
Category Ai Big Data, Dwf Labs Portfolio, Oxbull,
Chat room N/A https://t.me/gamersecommunity
Twitter https://twitter.com/UPPSentinel https://twitter.com/Gamersenft
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/Sentinel_Protocol N/A

Compare Sentinel Protocol (UPP) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Gamerse (LFG) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: