Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,611 $
▼ -0.59%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,806 $
▲ 1.01%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999486 $
▼ -0.03%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
613.40 $
▼ -1.71%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
177.22 $
▼ -1.68%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999925 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.529037 $
▼ -1.04%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.166665 $
▼ -1.63%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.48 $
▲ 2.28%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.483407 $
▼ -1.12%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
39.73 $
▼ -3.53%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▼ -2.53%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.55 $
▼ -0.93%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.118585 $
▼ -4.01%
Tỷ giá Bitcoin Cash BCH BCH
506.66 $
▼ -0.17%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between NAGA (NGC) and Team Vitality Fan Token (VIT)

Differences between NAGA (NGC) and Team Vitality Fan Token (VIT)

The table comparing the strength of NAGA (NGC) and Team Vitality Fan Token (VIT), which helps you determine the potential value of NAGA (NGC) in the future based on the current value of Team Vitality Fan Token (VIT) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

NAGA NAGA (NGC)

Team Vitality Fan Token Team Vitality Fan Token (VIT)

Price 0.0400909926 USD 0.1246859749 USD
( = 3.11 NAGA Price)
Supply N/A 3,823,815
Total supply 77,910,266 7,000,000
(= 0.09 NAGA Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 3632

476,776 USD

Rank 2005

Volume 24h 146,164 USD 128 USD
Change 1h -0.20 % -0.34 %
Change 24h -3.00 % 1.54 %
Change 7d 10.33 % 0.28 %
Total trading pairs 11 More details 1 More details
Launched 12/2017 07/2021
Platform Ethereum Chiliz
Category Marketplace, Centralized Exchange, Alleged Sec Securities, Sports, Fan Token,
Chat room https://naga.com/chat/public/qGp6MDoEROHnHJjXep2p https://discord.gg/QsJ8dAnsDy
Twitter https://twitter.com/nagainvesting https://twitter.com/socios
Reddit N/A https://reddit.com/r/chiliz

Compare NAGA (NGC) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Team Vitality Fan Token (VIT) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: