Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,672 $
▲ 2.64%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,835 $
▲ 1.26%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999822 $
▲ 0.05%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
632.35 $
▲ 5.27%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
166.54 $
▲ 0.92%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.521343 $
▲ 0.87%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.162262 $
▲ 2.31%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.454793 $
▲ 0.92%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.67 $
▲ 3.62%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 0.87%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.13 $
▲ 1.23%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.21 $
▼ -0.58%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.16 $
▲ 1.30%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113729 $
▼ -0.14%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Moss Carbon Credit (MCO2) and Genesis Shards (GS)

Differences between Moss Carbon Credit (MCO2) and Genesis Shards (GS)

The table comparing the strength of Moss Carbon Credit (MCO2) and Genesis Shards (GS), which helps you determine the potential value of Moss Carbon Credit (MCO2) in the future based on the current value of Genesis Shards (GS) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Moss Carbon Credit Moss Carbon Credit (MCO2)

Genesis Shards Genesis Shards (GS)

Price 0.6690297547 USD 0.0107309494 USD
( = 0.02 Moss Carbon Credit Price)
Supply N/A 12,030,988
Total supply 0 208,911,248
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 4987

129,104 USD

Rank 2353

Volume 24h 18,682 USD 22,056 USD
Change 1h 0.69 % 0.06 %
Change 24h -9.03 % 0.95 %
Change 7d -8.70 % -1.25 %
Total trading pairs 35 More details 5 More details
Launched 03/2021 04/2021
Platform Ethereum Ethereum
Category Arrington Xrp Capital Portfolio, Collectibles Nfts, Crowdfunding, Defi, Polkastarter, Okx Ventures Portfolio, Bnb Chain,
Chat room https://t.me/MCO2TokenChat https://t.me/genshardsCHAT
Twitter https://twitter.com/moss_earth https://twitter.com/GenShards
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Moss Carbon Credit (MCO2) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Genesis Shards (GS) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: