Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
68,472 $
▼ -0.91%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,851 $
▲ 2.90%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999561 $
▼ -0.04%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
599.34 $
▼ -0.24%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
162.72 $
▼ -2.70%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.00%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.528633 $
▼ -2.22%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.166873 $
▼ -1.63%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.32 $
▼ -1.09%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.457991 $
▼ -0.44%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.79 $
▼ -3.17%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000024 $
▼ -1.82%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.55 $
▲ 2.66%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.10 $
▼ -1.31%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.112949 $
▼ -0.58%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Magicverse (ORB) and Internet Computer Technology (ICT)

Differences between Magicverse (ORB) and Internet Computer Technology (ICT)

The table comparing the strength of Magicverse (ORB) and Internet Computer Technology (ICT), which helps you determine the potential value of Magicverse (ORB) in the future based on the current value of Internet Computer Technology (ICT) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Magicverse Magicverse (ORB)

Internet Computer Technology Internet Computer Technology (ICT)

Price 0.0000029492 USD 0.0510712039 USD
( = 17,317.04 Magicverse Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 100,000,000,000 700,000,000
(= 0.01 Magicverse Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 9759

N/A USD

Rank 5669

Volume 24h N/A USD 4,536 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % -1.23 %
Change 24h 0.00 % -14.64 %
Change 7d 18.77 % -16.90 %
Total trading pairs 10 More details 1 More details
Launched 12/2023 09/2023
Platform Ethereum Internet Computer Technology blockchain
Category , ,
Chat room https://t.me/Magic_verse https://discord.gg/nVAcxU4eRD
Twitter https://twitter.com/Magicverseco https://twitter.com/ICTech_
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Magicverse (ORB) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Internet Computer Technology (ICT) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: