Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
67,641 $
▼ -0.87%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,785 $
▲ 1.25%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999193 $
▼ -0.08%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
594.92 $
▲ 0.43%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
166.90 $
▲ 0.72%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.519020 $
▲ 0.36%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.159315 $
▲ 0.12%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.448708 $
▲ 0.28%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.29 $
▼ -2.12%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▼ -2.16%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
35.95 $
▼ -0.26%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.58 $
▲ 4.73%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.04 $
▲ 0.95%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.111375 $
▼ -0.09%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Lendr Network (LNDRR) and Army of Fortune Gem (AFG)

Differences between Lendr Network (LNDRR) and Army of Fortune Gem (AFG)

The table comparing the strength of Lendr Network (LNDRR) and Army of Fortune Gem (AFG), which helps you determine the potential value of Lendr Network (LNDRR) in the future based on the current value of Army of Fortune Gem (AFG) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Lendr Network Lendr Network (LNDRR)

Army of Fortune Gem Army of Fortune Gem (AFG)

Price 0.0027333081 USD 0.0177500267 USD
( = 6.49 Lendr Network Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 200,000,000 1,000,000,000
(= 5.00 Lendr Network Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 8273

N/A USD

Rank 4593

Volume 24h 3 USD 30,813 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % -0.86 %
Change 24h -65.00 % -8.94 %
Change 7d -59.75 % -30.59 %
Total trading pairs 6 More details 4 More details
Launched 04/2024 01/2024
Platform BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) Arbitrum
Category , Gaming, Governance, Metaverse, Dwf Labs Portfolio,
Chat room https://t.me/lendrnetwork/1 https://discord.com/invite/aofverse
Twitter https://twitter.com/lendrnetwork https://twitter.com/AOFverse
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Lendr Network (LNDRR) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Army of Fortune Gem (AFG) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: