Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
67,749 $
▼ -1.49%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,830 $
▼ -2.27%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999275 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
595.80 $
▼ -1.34%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
165.16 $
▼ -0.29%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999987 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.523133 $
▼ -1.40%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.164024 $
▼ -1.20%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.24 $
▼ -2.40%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.454755 $
▼ -1.67%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 0.11%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.67 $
▼ -1.58%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.22 $
▲ 6.91%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.39 $
▼ -1.09%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.111008 $
▼ -1.88%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between LeisurePay (LPY) and Leeds United Fan Token (LUFC)

Differences between LeisurePay (LPY) and Leeds United Fan Token (LUFC)

The table comparing the strength of LeisurePay (LPY) and Leeds United Fan Token (LUFC), which helps you determine the potential value of LeisurePay (LPY) in the future based on the current value of Leeds United Fan Token (LUFC) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

LeisurePay LeisurePay (LPY)

Leeds United Fan Token Leeds United Fan Token (LUFC)

Price 0.0005026265 USD 0.2565702132 USD
( = 510.46 LeisurePay Price)
Supply N/A 5,018,595
Total supply 10,000,000,000 10,000,000
(= 0.00 LeisurePay Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 7977

1,287,622 USD

Rank 1797

Volume 24h 16 USD 29,637 USD
Change 1h -0.01 % 0.93 %
Change 24h -0.03 % -10.57 %
Change 7d -0.05 % -12.43 %
Total trading pairs 2 More details 4 More details
Launched 03/2022 11/2021
Platform BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) Chiliz
Category , Sports, Fan Token,
Chat room https://t.me/LeisurePaytoken https://t.me/chiliztrade
Twitter https://twitter.com/leisurepayhq https://twitter.com/chiliz
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/LeisurePay N/A

Compare LeisurePay (LPY) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Leeds United Fan Token (LUFC) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: