Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
67,641 $
▼ -0.87%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,785 $
▲ 1.25%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999193 $
▼ -0.08%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
594.92 $
▲ 0.43%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
166.90 $
▲ 0.72%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.519020 $
▲ 0.36%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.159315 $
▲ 0.12%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.448708 $
▲ 0.28%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.29 $
▼ -2.12%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▼ -2.16%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
35.95 $
▼ -0.26%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.58 $
▲ 4.73%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.04 $
▲ 0.95%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.111375 $
▼ -0.09%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between JC Coin (JCC) and IoTeX (IOTX)

Differences between JC Coin (JCC) and IoTeX (IOTX)

The table comparing the strength of JC Coin (JCC) and IoTeX (IOTX), which helps you determine the potential value of JC Coin (JCC) in the future based on the current value of IoTeX (IOTX) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

JC Coin JC Coin (JCC)

IoTeX IoTeX (IOTX)

Price 0.0009630553 USD 0.0594668238 USD
( = 61.75 JC Coin Price)
Supply N/A 9,441,378,955
Total supply 500,000,000,000 10,000,000,000
(= 0.02 JC Coin Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 4877

561,448,819 USD

Rank 131

Volume 24h 20,320 USD 35,354,049 USD
Change 1h 1.91 % -1.90 %
Change 24h 2.57 % 0.58 %
Change 7d -17.37 % 12.21 %
Total trading pairs 3 More details 146 More details
Launched 04/2024 05/2018
Platform Ethereum IoTeX blockchain
Category Ethereum Ecosystem, Platform, Distributed Computing, Iot, Hashkey Capital Portfolio, Kenetic Capital Portfolio, Iotex Ecosystem, Bnb Chain, Depin,
Chat room https://discord.gg/2Ug2USGV https://t.me/IoTeXGroup
Twitter https://twitter.com/coin_jc95497 https://twitter.com/iotex_io
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/jccoin https://reddit.com/r/IoTex

Compare JC Coin (JCC) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare IoTeX (IOTX) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: