Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
68,294 $
▲ 2.34%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,140 $
▲ 2.18%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
1.00 $
▲ 0.03%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
578.81 $
▲ 0.50%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
181.45 $
▲ 6.50%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.522876 $
▲ 2.26%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.54 $
▲ 2.36%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.153279 $
▲ 1.99%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.468465 $
▲ 0.25%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000024 $
▲ 1.31%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.90 $
▲ 3.34%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.122261 $
▲ 1.00%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.14 $
▲ 2.10%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
16.61 $
▼ -2.36%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Javelin (JVL) and Stratis [Old] (STRAX)

Differences between Javelin (JVL) and Stratis [Old] (STRAX)

The table comparing the strength of Javelin (JVL) and Stratis [Old] (STRAX), which helps you determine the potential value of Javelin (JVL) in the future based on the current value of Stratis [Old] (STRAX) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Javelin Javelin (JVL)

Stratis [Old] Stratis [Old] (STRAX)

Price 0.0007119331 USD 0.0798264293 USD
( = 112.13 Javelin Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 1,000,000,000 0
(= 0.00 Javelin Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 9734

N/A USD

Rank 4350

Volume 24h N/A USD 33,846 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % -0.06 %
Change 24h 0.00 % 1.54 %
Change 7d 0.03 % 4.23 %
Total trading pairs 1 More details 45 More details
Launched 11/2023 08/2016
Platform Ethereum Stratis [Old] blockchain
Category Gambling, Gaming, Hybrid Pow Pos, Poa, Platform, Enterprise Solutions, Masternodes, Smart Contracts, Staking, Dao, Sidechain,
Chat room https://t.me/javelingametoken https://t.me/StratisPlatform
Twitter https://twitter.com/javelingamecoin https://twitter.com/stratisplatform
Reddit N/A https://reddit.com/r/Stratisplatform

Compare Javelin (JVL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Stratis [Old] (STRAX) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: