Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,055 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,793 $
▲ 1.04%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999691 $
▲ 0.00%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
600.80 $
▼ -0.69%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
162.83 $
▼ -4.00%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999919 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.535437 $
▼ -0.28%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.169471 $
▲ 0.71%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.30 $
▼ -1.08%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.458115 $
▼ -1.25%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
37.16 $
▼ -3.30%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▼ -1.75%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.38 $
▲ 1.09%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.31 $
▲ 0.91%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113537 $
▼ -0.41%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between governance ZIL (GZIL) and Wrapped Conflux (WCFX)

Differences between governance ZIL (GZIL) and Wrapped Conflux (WCFX)

The table comparing the strength of governance ZIL (GZIL) and Wrapped Conflux (WCFX), which helps you determine the potential value of governance ZIL (GZIL) in the future based on the current value of Wrapped Conflux (WCFX) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

governance ZIL governance ZIL (GZIL)

Wrapped Conflux Wrapped Conflux (WCFX)

Price 4.30 USD 0.2190400898 USD
( = 0.05 governance ZIL Price)
Supply N/A 31,600,856
Total supply 559,970 31,600,856
(= 56.43 governance ZIL Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 6388

6,921,854 USD

Rank 1311

Volume 24h 884 USD 127,814 USD
Change 1h 0.14 % -0.62 %
Change 24h -0.15 % -1.80 %
Change 7d 4.05 % -4.82 %
Total trading pairs 6 More details 12 More details
Launched 12/2020 11/2020
Platform Zilliqa Wrapped Conflux blockchain
Category Dao, Zilliqa Ecosystem, ,
Chat room https://t.me/zilliqachat https://discord.com/invite/aCZkf2C
Twitter N/A https://twitter.com/Conflux_Network
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/zilliqa https://reddit.com/r/Conflux_Network

Compare governance ZIL (GZIL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Wrapped Conflux (WCFX) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: