Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
70,908 $
▼ -0.14%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,846 $
▲ 1.52%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
1.00 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
698.15 $
▼ -1.04%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
172.50 $
▼ -0.54%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.524356 $
▼ -0.14%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.161901 $
▼ -0.45%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
7.22 $
▼ -3.38%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.458728 $
▼ -0.60%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000026 $
▼ -0.31%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.19 $
▼ -0.14%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.18 $
▼ -0.60%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.39 $
▼ -3.08%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.114190 $
▼ -0.07%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between governance ZIL (GZIL) and Syntropy (NOIA)

Differences between governance ZIL (GZIL) and Syntropy (NOIA)

The table comparing the strength of governance ZIL (GZIL) and Syntropy (NOIA), which helps you determine the potential value of governance ZIL (GZIL) in the future based on the current value of Syntropy (NOIA) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

governance ZIL governance ZIL (GZIL)

Syntropy Syntropy (NOIA)

Price 4.39 USD 0.1715864918 USD
( = 0.04 governance ZIL Price)
Supply N/A 729,553,097
Total supply 559,970 1,000,000,000
(= 1,785.81 governance ZIL Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 6649

125,181,457 USD

Rank 389

Volume 24h 744 USD 4,160,611 USD
Change 1h 0.40 % -0.19 %
Change 24h 0.14 % -16.70 %
Change 7d 0.14 % -19.09 %
Total trading pairs 6 More details 20 More details
Launched 12/2020 07/2019
Platform Zilliqa Ethereum
Category Dao, Zilliqa Ecosystem, Iot, Scaling, Staking, Substrate, Governance, Analytics, Web3, Data Availability,
Chat room https://t.me/zilliqachat https://t.me/NoiaNetwork
Twitter N/A https://twitter.com/Syntropynet
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/zilliqa https://reddit.com/r/SyntropyNet

Compare governance ZIL (GZIL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Syntropy (NOIA) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: