Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
68,472 $
▼ -0.91%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,851 $
▲ 2.90%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999561 $
▼ -0.04%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
599.34 $
▼ -0.24%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
162.72 $
▼ -2.70%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.00%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.528633 $
▼ -2.22%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.166873 $
▼ -1.63%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.32 $
▼ -1.09%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.457991 $
▼ -0.44%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.79 $
▼ -3.17%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000024 $
▼ -1.82%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.55 $
▲ 2.66%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.10 $
▼ -1.31%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.112949 $
▼ -0.58%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between governance ZIL (GZIL) and Surviving Soldiers (SSG)

Differences between governance ZIL (GZIL) and Surviving Soldiers (SSG)

The table comparing the strength of governance ZIL (GZIL) and Surviving Soldiers (SSG), which helps you determine the potential value of governance ZIL (GZIL) in the future based on the current value of Surviving Soldiers (SSG) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

governance ZIL governance ZIL (GZIL)

Surviving Soldiers Surviving Soldiers (SSG)

Price 4.27 USD 0.0643861891 USD
( = 0.02 governance ZIL Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 559,970 5,000,000
(= 8.93 governance ZIL Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 5584

N/A USD

Rank 7701

Volume 24h 5,499 USD 39 USD
Change 1h -0.16 % 0.00 %
Change 24h -0.39 % 1.38 %
Change 7d 5.88 % 3.96 %
Total trading pairs 6 More details 14 More details
Launched 12/2020 11/2021
Platform Zilliqa BNB Smart Chain (BEP20)
Category Dao, Zilliqa Ecosystem, ,
Chat room https://t.me/zilliqachat https://t.me/SurvivingSoldiersCommunity
Twitter N/A https://twitter.com/survivingsol?s=21
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/zilliqa https://reddit.com/r/survivingsoldiers

Compare governance ZIL (GZIL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Surviving Soldiers (SSG) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: