Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,055 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,793 $
▲ 1.04%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999691 $
▲ 0.00%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
600.80 $
▼ -0.69%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
162.83 $
▼ -4.00%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999919 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.535437 $
▼ -0.28%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.169471 $
▲ 0.71%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.30 $
▼ -1.08%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.458115 $
▼ -1.25%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
37.16 $
▼ -3.30%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▼ -1.75%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.38 $
▲ 1.09%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.31 $
▲ 0.91%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113537 $
▼ -0.41%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Genesis Shards (GS) and MarbleVerse (RLM)

Differences between Genesis Shards (GS) and MarbleVerse (RLM)

The table comparing the strength of Genesis Shards (GS) and MarbleVerse (RLM), which helps you determine the potential value of Genesis Shards (GS) in the future based on the current value of MarbleVerse (RLM) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Genesis Shards Genesis Shards (GS)

MarbleVerse MarbleVerse (RLM)

Price 0.0104018757 USD 0.0005217016 USD
( = 0.05 Genesis Shards Price)
Supply 12,030,988 N/A
(= 0.00 Genesis Shards Supply)
Total supply 208,911,248 100,000,000
(= 0.48 Genesis Shards Total supply)
Marketcap 125,145 USD

Rank 2339

N/A USD

Rank 9441

Volume 24h 2,882 USD N/A USD
Change 1h 2.65 % 0.00 %
Change 24h 0.08 % 0.00 %
Change 7d 17.09 % 16.42 %
Total trading pairs 5 More details 2 More details
Launched 04/2021 04/2022
Platform Ethereum Cronos
Category Collectibles Nfts, Crowdfunding, Defi, Polkastarter, Okx Ventures Portfolio, Bnb Chain, ,
Chat room https://t.me/genshardsCHAT https://discord.gg/marbleverse
Twitter https://twitter.com/GenShards https://twitter.com/marbleverse_io
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Genesis Shards (GS) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare MarbleVerse (RLM) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: