Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
93,308 $
▲ 0.77%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,333 $
▼ -0.57%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.998063 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
2.08 $
▲ 0.45%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
699.75 $
▼ -0.45%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
190.65 $
▼ -0.19%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.315472 $
▲ 0.55%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999952 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.844333 $
▼ -1.50%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.254251 $
▲ 0.74%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
35.58 $
▼ -1.20%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
5.48 $
▼ -1.91%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
19.89 $
▼ -3.33%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000021 $
▲ 0.03%
Tỷ giá Bitget Token BGB BGB
6.08 $
▼ -3.50%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Gems (GEM) and Stella Fantasy (SFTY)

Differences between Gems (GEM) and Stella Fantasy (SFTY)

The table comparing the strength of Gems (GEM) and Stella Fantasy (SFTY), which helps you determine the potential value of Gems (GEM) in the future based on the current value of Stella Fantasy (SFTY) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Gems Gems (GEM)

Stella Fantasy Stella Fantasy (SFTY)

Price 0.0000760638 USD 0.0008043598 USD
( = 10.57 Gems Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 8,000,000,000 1,000,000,000
(= 0.13 Gems Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 8463

N/A USD

Rank 8830

Volume 24h 16 USD 4 USD
Change 1h 0.02 % 0.01 %
Change 24h 0.01 % 1.16 %
Change 7d 5.72 % -3.94 %
Total trading pairs 12 More details 5 More details
Launched 02/2018 04/2023
Platform Ethereum BNB Smart Chain (BEP20)
Category Platform, Jobs, Sharing Economy, Pantera Capital Portfolio, Collectibles Nfts, Gaming, Entertainment, Binance Chain, Play To Earn, Animoca Brands Portfolio,
Chat room https://t.me/gemsorg https://discord.gg/stellafantasy
Twitter https://twitter.com/gems https://twitter.com/rstellaFantasy
Reddit https://reddit.com/r/gemsprotocol N/A

Compare Gems (GEM) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Stella Fantasy (SFTY) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: