Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
68,734 $
▲ 2.38%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,746 $
▲ 1.84%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999656 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
601.52 $
▲ 1.48%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
169.04 $
▲ 1.72%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▲ 0.00%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.535144 $
▲ 2.40%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.165590 $
▲ 4.64%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.34 $
▲ 3.21%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.462293 $
▲ 0.15%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.36 $
▲ 1.73%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 4.05%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.29 $
▲ 2.49%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.114948 $
▲ 1.12%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.09 $
▲ 1.36%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Galaxy (GLXY) and Crypto Asset Governance Alliance (CAGA)

Differences between Galaxy (GLXY) and Crypto Asset Governance Alliance (CAGA)

The table comparing the strength of Galaxy (GLXY) and Crypto Asset Governance Alliance (CAGA), which helps you determine the potential value of Galaxy (GLXY) in the future based on the current value of Crypto Asset Governance Alliance (CAGA) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Galaxy Galaxy (GLXY)

Crypto Asset Governance Alliance Crypto Asset Governance Alliance (CAGA)

Price 0.0013812237 USD 0.0004810069 USD
( = 0.35 Galaxy Price)
Supply N/A 61,492,072,802
Total supply 299,999,998 100,000,000,000
(= 333.33 Galaxy Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 9397

29,578,113 USD

Rank 793

Volume 24h N/A USD 1,611,670 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % 0.11 %
Change 24h 0.00 % -0.90 %
Change 7d 0.84 % 0.32 %
Total trading pairs 2 More details 11 More details
Launched 05/2022 11/2023
Platform Solana Ethereum
Category , Ethereum Ecosystem,
Chat room https://t.co/pkCmoWxafA https://discord.com/invite/cagacrypto
Twitter https://twitter.com/Astrals_NFT https://twitter.com/_cagacrypto
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Galaxy (GLXY) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Crypto Asset Governance Alliance (CAGA) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: