Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
71,169 $
▲ 0.84%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,852 $
▲ 0.90%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
1.00 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
694.59 $
▲ 1.68%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
173.38 $
▲ 1.45%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999979 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.525593 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.162833 $
▲ 0.92%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
7.25 $
▲ 0.29%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.460668 $
▼ -0.32%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000026 $
▲ 4.43%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.38 $
▲ 1.28%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.71 $
▼ -0.04%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.23 $
▲ 0.38%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.114436 $
▼ -0.05%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) and CHICA (CHICA)

Differences between Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) and CHICA (CHICA)

The table comparing the strength of Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) and CHICA (CHICA), which helps you determine the potential value of Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) in the future based on the current value of CHICA (CHICA) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Footballcoin (XFC) Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC)

CHICA CHICA (CHICA)

Price 0.0081168687 USD 0.0157200594 USD
( = 1.94 Footballcoin (XFC) Price)
Supply 374,660,526 N/A
(= 0.00 Footballcoin (XFC) Supply)
Total supply 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000
(= 1.00 Footballcoin (XFC) Total supply)
Marketcap 3,041,070 USD

Rank 1569

N/A USD

Rank 4485

Volume 24h 42,868 USD 44,681 USD
Change 1h -0.08 % 0.76 %
Change 24h 0.17 % -5.25 %
Change 7d 0.66 % -1.51 %
Total trading pairs 5 More details 2 More details
Launched 01/2019 04/2023
Platform Footballcoin (XFC) blockchain BNB Smart Chain (BEP20)
Category Sports, Soccer, ,
Chat room https://t.me/joinchat/HIik3wz4MX_r1Qxnc4P0GA https://t.me/chicachain_ann
Twitter https://twitter.com/xfcfootballcoin https://twitter.com/chica_io
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare CHICA (CHICA) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: