Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
68,472 $
▼ -0.91%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,851 $
▲ 2.90%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999561 $
▼ -0.04%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
599.34 $
▼ -0.24%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
162.72 $
▼ -2.70%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.00%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.528633 $
▼ -2.22%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.166873 $
▼ -1.63%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.32 $
▼ -1.09%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.457991 $
▼ -0.44%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.79 $
▼ -3.17%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000024 $
▼ -1.82%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.55 $
▲ 2.66%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.10 $
▼ -1.31%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.112949 $
▼ -0.58%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) and Azit (AZIT)

Differences between Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) and Azit (AZIT)

The table comparing the strength of Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) and Azit (AZIT), which helps you determine the potential value of Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) in the future based on the current value of Azit (AZIT) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Footballcoin (XFC) Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC)

Azit Azit (AZIT)

Price 0.0080663820 USD 0.0368619158 USD
( = 4.57 Footballcoin (XFC) Price)
Supply 374,660,526 192,351,657
(= 0.51 Footballcoin (XFC) Supply)
Total supply 1,000,000,000 500,000,000
(= 0.50 Footballcoin (XFC) Total supply)
Marketcap 3,022,155 USD

Rank 1541

7,090,451 USD

Rank 1300

Volume 24h 44,500 USD 143 USD
Change 1h -0.15 % 0.00 %
Change 24h -0.48 % -0.70 %
Change 7d -0.51 % -5.29 %
Total trading pairs 5 More details 9 More details
Launched 01/2019 03/2022
Platform Footballcoin (XFC) blockchain Klaytn
Category Sports, Soccer, ,
Chat room https://t.me/joinchat/HIik3wz4MX_r1Qxnc4P0GA https://open.kakao.com/o/gMc9IChd
Twitter https://twitter.com/xfcfootballcoin https://twitter.com/azit_alliance
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Footballcoin (XFC) (XFC) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Azit (AZIT) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: