Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
70,064 $
▼ -1.38%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,744 $
▼ -2.23%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.998787 $
▼ -0.08%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
691.73 $
▼ -1.85%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
166.85 $
▼ -2.82%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999733 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.517185 $
▼ -1.60%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.157888 $
▼ -2.32%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
7.47 $
▲ 0.89%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.472303 $
▲ 3.00%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▼ -3.76%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
35.56 $
▼ -2.80%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.06 $
▼ -2.35%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.28 $
▼ -0.46%
Tỷ giá Bitcoin Cash BCH BCH
511.25 $
▲ 3.22%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between CodeXchain (CDX) and Knights of Cathena (CGO)

Differences between CodeXchain (CDX) and Knights of Cathena (CGO)

The table comparing the strength of CodeXchain (CDX) and Knights of Cathena (CGO), which helps you determine the potential value of CodeXchain (CDX) in the future based on the current value of Knights of Cathena (CGO) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

CodeXchain CodeXchain (CDX)

Knights of Cathena Knights of Cathena (CGO)

Price 0.0065127103 USD 0.0001102571 USD
( = 0.02 CodeXchain Price)
Supply N/A N/A
Total supply 1,000,000,000 100,722,581,141
(= 100.72 CodeXchain Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 5538

N/A USD

Rank 6225

Volume 24h 8,375 USD 1,933 USD
Change 1h 0.99 % -0.28 %
Change 24h -5.14 % 0.96 %
Change 7d -13.88 % -13.41 %
Total trading pairs 8 More details 2 More details
Launched 01/2024 04/2024
Platform BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) MultiversX
Category Platform, Gaming, Elrond Ecosystem,
Chat room https://discord.com/invite/v2uA6QpZPc https://discord.knights-of-cathena.com/
Twitter https://twitter.com/codexchain https://twitter.com/twitter.knights-of-cathena.com
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare CodeXchain (CDX) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Knights of Cathena (CGO) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: