Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,155 $
▲ 0.88%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,746 $
▲ 0.89%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999934 $
▼ -0.00%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
601.78 $
▲ 0.24%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
167.91 $
▲ 0.87%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999951 $
▼ -0.03%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.540725 $
▲ 1.14%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.172030 $
▲ 5.50%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.43 $
▲ 0.93%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.461613 $
▲ 0.47%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.16 $
▲ 0.67%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 2.29%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.49 $
▲ 3.41%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.39 $
▲ 1.71%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113680 $
▼ -1.61%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Two Lands (LANDS)

Differences between Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Two Lands (LANDS)

The table comparing the strength of Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Two Lands (LANDS), which helps you determine the potential value of Circuits of Value (COVAL) in the future based on the current value of Two Lands (LANDS) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Circuits of Value Circuits of Value (COVAL)

Two Lands Two Lands (LANDS)

Price 0.0231389881 USD 0.0010290650 USD
( = 0.04 Circuits of Value Price)
Supply 1,784,838,484 N/A
(= 0.00 Circuits of Value Supply)
Total supply 1,786,752,136 1,000,000,000
(= 0.56 Circuits of Value Total supply)
Marketcap 41,299,357 USD

Rank 706

N/A USD

Rank 9773

Volume 24h 165,413 USD N/A USD
Change 1h -0.30 % 0.00 %
Change 24h 0.06 % 0.00 %
Change 7d -2.25 % 22.09 %
Total trading pairs 32 More details 1 More details
Launched 01/2015 01/2024
Platform Ethereum Ethereum
Category Collectibles Nfts, Defi, Bitcoin Ecosystem, Gaming,
Chat room N/A https://t.me/twolandstokenportal
Twitter https://twitter.com/circuitsofvalue https://twitter.com/twolandstoken
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Circuits of Value (COVAL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Two Lands (LANDS) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: