Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,264 $
▲ 1.08%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,749 $
▲ 0.60%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999886 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
602.25 $
▲ 0.35%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
168.45 $
▲ 0.39%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999984 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.541808 $
▲ 1.13%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.173961 $
▲ 6.20%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.38 $
▼ -0.23%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.462085 $
▲ 0.56%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.29 $
▲ 0.79%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 2.87%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.43 $
▲ 2.54%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.44 $
▲ 1.12%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113786 $
▼ -1.45%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Stone (0NE)

Differences between Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Stone (0NE)

The table comparing the strength of Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Stone (0NE), which helps you determine the potential value of Circuits of Value (COVAL) in the future based on the current value of Stone (0NE) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Circuits of Value Circuits of Value (COVAL)

Stone Stone (0NE)

Price 0.0232094480 USD 0.0000000003 USD
( = 0.00 Circuits of Value Price)
Supply 1,784,838,484 N/A
(= 0.00 Circuits of Value Supply)
Total supply 1,786,752,136 1,000,000,000,000,000
(= 559,674.72 Circuits of Value Total supply)
Marketcap 41,425,116 USD

Rank 706

N/A USD

Rank 9485

Volume 24h 163,838 USD N/A USD
Change 1h -0.16 % 0.00 %
Change 24h -0.44 % 0.00 %
Change 7d -1.94 % -14.17 %
Total trading pairs 32 More details 13 More details
Launched 01/2015 04/2022
Platform Ethereum Ethereum
Category Collectibles Nfts, Defi, Bitcoin Ecosystem, Ethereum Ecosystem,
Chat room N/A https://t.me/civsettlers
Twitter https://twitter.com/circuitsofvalue https://twitter.com/CivFund
Reddit N/A https://reddit.com/r/civfund

Compare Circuits of Value (COVAL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Stone (0NE) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: