Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,264 $
▲ 1.08%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,749 $
▲ 0.60%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999886 $
▲ 0.01%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
602.25 $
▲ 0.35%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
168.45 $
▲ 0.39%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999984 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.541808 $
▲ 1.13%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.173961 $
▲ 6.20%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.38 $
▼ -0.23%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.462085 $
▲ 0.56%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.29 $
▲ 0.79%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 2.87%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.43 $
▲ 2.54%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.44 $
▲ 1.12%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.113786 $
▼ -1.45%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Sapphire (SAPP)

Differences between Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Sapphire (SAPP)

The table comparing the strength of Circuits of Value (COVAL) and Sapphire (SAPP), which helps you determine the potential value of Circuits of Value (COVAL) in the future based on the current value of Sapphire (SAPP) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Circuits of Value Circuits of Value (COVAL)

Sapphire Sapphire (SAPP)

Price 0.0232094480 USD 0.0041329503 USD
( = 0.18 Circuits of Value Price)
Supply 1,784,838,484 N/A
(= 0.00 Circuits of Value Supply)
Total supply 1,786,752,136 1,761,129,199
(= 0.99 Circuits of Value Total supply)
Marketcap 41,425,116 USD

Rank 706

N/A USD

Rank 5909

Volume 24h 163,838 USD 2,662 USD
Change 1h -0.16 % 0.41 %
Change 24h -0.44 % 1.90 %
Change 7d -1.94 % 17.40 %
Total trading pairs 32 More details 5 More details
Launched 01/2015 03/2020
Platform Ethereum Sapphire blockchain
Category Collectibles Nfts, Defi, Bitcoin Ecosystem, Masternodes,
Chat room N/A https://discord.gg/C9Hu6h5
Twitter https://twitter.com/circuitsofvalue https://twitter.com/Sapphire_Core
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Circuits of Value (COVAL) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Sapphire (SAPP) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: