Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
68,530 $
▲ 0.90%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,727 $
▼ -1.22%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999771 $
▲ 0.02%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
600.41 $
▲ 0.34%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
167.83 $
▼ -4.65%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999972 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.535734 $
▲ 1.41%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.163796 $
▲ 2.62%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.40 $
▲ 3.01%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.459535 $
▼ -1.23%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.01 $
▼ -1.26%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000024 $
▼ -0.77%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.24 $
▲ 0.60%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
17.25 $
▲ 3.95%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.115452 $
▲ 0.26%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between CheersLand (CHEERS) and Onomy Protocol (NOM)

Differences between CheersLand (CHEERS) and Onomy Protocol (NOM)

The table comparing the strength of CheersLand (CHEERS) and Onomy Protocol (NOM), which helps you determine the potential value of CheersLand (CHEERS) in the future based on the current value of Onomy Protocol (NOM) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

CheersLand CheersLand (CHEERS)

Onomy Protocol Onomy Protocol (NOM)

Price 0.0090033258 USD 0.1083808845 USD
( = 12.04 CheersLand Price)
Supply N/A 97,577,551
Total supply 100,000,000 163,056,900
(= 1.63 CheersLand Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 5840

10,575,541 USD

Rank 1139

Volume 24h 3,752 USD 137,326 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % -1.53 %
Change 24h 2.23 % -3.89 %
Change 7d -22.48 % -13.91 %
Total trading pairs 7 More details 10 More details
Launched 11/2021 06/2021
Platform BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) Onomy Protocol blockchain
Category Vbc Ventures Portfolio, Dwf Labs Portfolio,
Chat room https://t.me/cheersland https://t.me/onomyprotocol
Twitter https://twitter.com/cheers_land https://twitter.com/onomyprotocol
Reddit N/A https://reddit.com/r/onomyprotocol

Compare CheersLand (CHEERS) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Onomy Protocol (NOM) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: