Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
70,099 $
▲ 1.90%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,943 $
▲ 2.09%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999103 $
▼ -0.06%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
611.35 $
▲ 1.51%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
171.40 $
▲ 5.25%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
1.00 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.538603 $
▲ 1.61%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.171376 $
▲ 2.45%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.47 $
▲ 2.63%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.472771 $
▲ 2.96%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000026 $
▲ 6.54%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.60 $
▲ 4.80%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.71 $
▲ 2.31%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.40 $
▲ 7.31%
Tỷ giá Bitcoin Cash BCH BCH
499.41 $
▲ 3.13%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Champz (CHAMPZ) and WAX (WAXP)

Differences between Champz (CHAMPZ) and WAX (WAXP)

The table comparing the strength of Champz (CHAMPZ) and WAX (WAXP), which helps you determine the potential value of Champz (CHAMPZ) in the future based on the current value of WAX (WAXP) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Champz Champz (CHAMPZ)

WAX WAX (WAXP)

Price 0.0067621143 USD 0.0687025480 USD
( = 10.16 Champz Price)
Supply N/A 3,449,571,013
Total supply 1,000,000,000 4,187,742,782
(= 4.19 Champz Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 5756

236,994,318 USD

Rank 288

Volume 24h 4,911 USD 23,854,248 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % -0.78 %
Change 24h 2.57 % 6.73 %
Change 7d 2.96 % 8.42 %
Total trading pairs 2 More details 75 More details
Launched 06/2023 12/2017
Platform Ethereum WAX blockchain
Category Gaming, Memes, Play To Earn, Media, Collectibles Nfts, Gaming, Entertainment, Payments, Metaverse, Galaxy Digital Portfolio, Kenetic Capital Portfolio, Play To Earn, Okx Ventures Portfolio, Layer 1,
Chat room https://t.me/champzERC https://t.me/wax_io
Twitter https://twitter.com/ChampzERC https://twitter.com/WAX_io
Reddit N/A https://reddit.com/r/WAX_io

Compare Champz (CHAMPZ) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare WAX (WAXP) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: