Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
69,393 $
▲ 1.28%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,895 $
▲ 1.82%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999165 $
▼ -0.04%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
603.57 $
▲ 0.64%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
169.86 $
▲ 3.95%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999953 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.533773 $
▲ 1.04%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.169082 $
▲ 1.72%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.39 $
▲ 1.32%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.467901 $
▲ 2.05%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000026 $
▲ 4.90%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
38.22 $
▲ 3.97%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.78 $
▲ 10.16%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.63 $
▲ 1.06%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.112448 $
▼ -0.56%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Catvills Coin (CATVILLS) and Gourmet Galaxy (GUM)

Differences between Catvills Coin (CATVILLS) and Gourmet Galaxy (GUM)

The table comparing the strength of Catvills Coin (CATVILLS) and Gourmet Galaxy (GUM), which helps you determine the potential value of Catvills Coin (CATVILLS) in the future based on the current value of Gourmet Galaxy (GUM) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Catvills Coin Catvills Coin (CATVILLS)

Gourmet Galaxy Gourmet Galaxy (GUM)

Price 0.0000000000 USD 0.0100579120 USD
( = 226,618,095.68 Catvills Coin Price)
Supply N/A 3,312,145
Total supply 1,000,000,000,000,000 20,000,000
(= 0.00 Catvills Coin Total supply)
Marketcap N/A USD

Rank 9612

33,313 USD

Rank 2507

Volume 24h N/A USD 12,603 USD
Change 1h 0.00 % -0.02 %
Change 24h 0.00 % -3.55 %
Change 7d -0.33 % -3.76 %
Total trading pairs 4 More details 22 More details
Launched 12/2022 02/2021
Platform BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) Ethereum
Category , Collectibles Nfts, Bnb Chain,
Chat room https://t.me/Catvillscoinportal https://t.me/gourmetgalaxy_chat
Twitter https://twitter.com/catvillscoin https://twitter.com/gourmetfinance
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Catvills Coin (CATVILLS) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare Gourmet Galaxy (GUM) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: