Tỷ giá Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin
67,749 $
▼ -1.49%
Tỷ giá Ethereum ETH Ethereum
3,830 $
▼ -2.27%
Tỷ giá Tether USDt USDT USDT
0.999275 $
▼ -0.02%
Tỷ giá BNB BNB BNB
595.80 $
▼ -1.34%
Tỷ giá Solana SOL Solana
165.16 $
▼ -0.29%
Tỷ giá USDC USDC USDC
0.999987 $
▼ -0.01%
Tỷ giá XRP XRP XRP
0.523133 $
▼ -1.40%
Tỷ giá Dogecoin DOGE Dogecoin
0.164024 $
▼ -1.20%
Tỷ giá Toncoin TON Toncoin
6.24 $
▼ -2.40%
Tỷ giá Cardano ADA Cardano
0.454755 $
▼ -1.67%
Tỷ giá Shiba Inu SHIB Shiba Inu
0.000025 $
▲ 0.11%
Tỷ giá Avalanche AVAX Avalanche
36.67 $
▼ -1.58%
Tỷ giá Chainlink LINK Chainlink
18.22 $
▲ 6.91%
Tỷ giá Polkadot DOT Polkadot
7.39 $
▼ -1.09%
Tỷ giá TRON TRX TRON
0.111008 $
▼ -1.88%
  1. Home iconYou are here:
  2. Home
  3. All cryptocurrencies
  4. Differences between Bad Idea AI (BAD) and DogWif2.0 (WIF2)

Differences between Bad Idea AI (BAD) and DogWif2.0 (WIF2)

The table comparing the strength of Bad Idea AI (BAD) and DogWif2.0 (WIF2), which helps you determine the potential value of Bad Idea AI (BAD) in the future based on the current value of DogWif2.0 (WIF2) and vice versa.

Criteria of comparison

Bad Idea AI Bad Idea AI (BAD)

DogWif2.0 DogWif2.0 (WIF2)

Price 0.0000000264 USD 0.0000364454 USD
( = 1,379.96 Bad Idea AI Price)
Supply 530,334,921,255,710 N/A
(= 0.00 Bad Idea AI Supply)
Total supply 831,041,059,897,327 1,000,000,000
(= 0.00 Bad Idea AI Total supply)
Marketcap 14,006,415 USD

Rank 1069

N/A USD

Rank 4965

Volume 24h 2,907,101 USD 18,461 USD
Change 1h -0.27 % -3.80 %
Change 24h -1.26 % -13.33 %
Change 7d -14.25 % -44.65 %
Total trading pairs 24 More details 2 More details
Launched 05/2023 05/2024
Platform Ethereum Solana
Category Ai Big Data, Memes, Dao, Ethereum Ecosystem, Token, Generative Ai, Telegram Bot, Discord Bots, ,
Chat room https://t.me/badideaai https://t.me/DOGWIF20
Twitter https://twitter.com/badideaai https://twitter.com/dogwif02
Reddit N/A N/A

Compare Bad Idea AI (BAD) with other cryptocurencies here

Compare DogWif2.0 (WIF2) with other cryptocurencies here

Enter a name or symbol to compare: